Today was WWDC. Today Apple released a beta of Safari [the Mac web browser] for Windows. Today was a good day for battles between Microsoft apologists and Mac fanboys.
But I’ve been in my battle someplace else. Today I’m here to express my sadness regarding David Maynor’s latest blog post. Of course, Mr. Maynor does not need to care about my opinions in the least bit - after all, his name is known in security circles well enough. I do respect his work - my ‘port’ of Ferret was a tribute to that - but I won’t hold back because of that.
First off, congratulations. There are bugs in beta-grade software. Important bugs, admittedly. So what would one do? Dump the product or report said bugs upstream in hope of a fix from the original developer[s]. Why do the latter? Well, as someone who would be concerned about the state of the Internet and the fact that security issues are an important reason for the pollution of the Web, it does sound like a reasonable thing to do. Sure, mr. Maynor has had previous run-ins with Apple which he reports as being of a negative nature - and, as such, has decided to withhold disclosure of security vulnerabilities to the Fruit. Fine, it’s his “Intellectual Property” or simply his right to do so.
What’s going to happen? I’m not the Oracle. What could happen? Safari final comes to Windows. Bugs are still - maybe just some, maybe all - there. Mister Maynor can laugh in the face of Apple for failing to fix them and then sell them to the highest bidder [granted, it will probably be a security company and not blackhats.] Another hit against Apple and some brownie points for ErrataSec.
I am disappointed by what I can only perceive to be dubious intent. A vendetta of sorts which will damage the users more than the companies involved [Apple, ErrataSec or any other third-parties that get drawn into this.] In light of the alleged gag-order imposed with regards to the Apple WiFi affair, I think another alternative means of distribution of said bugs could be found. I understand that mister Maynor has to pay his bills - it would be wise of more companies to offer bounties for the finding and reporting of serious security risks [as some do] - but his attitude does not encourage any kind of positive action to come about. While I do not vilify mercenaries in the security world, I do take issue with those inconsistent in their approach.
UPDATE: It seems something ticked him off, the trackback link was removed sometime during the day today. Wonder what that means…
UPDATE 2: Trackback now shows on ErrataSec. I see others were removed so maybe DM thought I was spamming. A trackback link should be used as a comment, generally, to let people know you’re talking about something they said.