One can’t help but feel annoyed and maybe slightly envious on all these people that are getting rich off of Web 2.0 without creating or inventing anything themselves. No community contributions, no breakthrough docs to get respect, just smoke. You don’t even need to really understand what the hell’s going on all the time, just play it cool and have a few friends that do the same as you. Get on a podcast, a videocast, start a news site or a social networking site even when they are far from original. It’s all about giving the story a spin.
Shortly you get advertisers and people sending you things for no reason. You don’t deserve them, you don’t use them to advance anything. You might review them, from your throne as an alleged technology pundit - nothing more than a misinformed enthusiast, really. Why give an iPhone for free to Leo Laporte who was one already, makes money off of talking about it but doesn’t know things that I, left without Internet for two weeks, already have clear in my head?
There is an acceptable quantity of uncertainty to be expected in news. There is an expected level of advantage-taking in terms of business, in general.
I’ve come to terms, though, that the real makers, the O.G.s move silently. An IRC channel someplace, a lone wiki. Only by handle known. I’m just hoping more people start seeing past the consumerist push that Web 2.0 is. Part of me sees it as nothing more than an extension of the seedy things of physical life into the cyberculture. I’m beginning to see it less as a technological advance or a content-access model.